必要
网站运行所必需。始终启用。
We install the components you govern AI with — model control, tools, memory, flows, observability — inside your own subscription and under your own keys. We hand them over working, and you take them from there.
All inside your subscription. Your keys, your network, your control.
You start with one team and one cloud, and it grows when there is a reason. Every step closes with scope and timeframe before the next one opens.
You know you want to do something but not whether it is feasible, what data it needs, or what it takes. This answers that.
Credited in full if you continue.
Model control for one team, in your cloud and under your keys. Sized to land without opening a long procurement process.
Memory, flows, observability, security. Each one is added when you need it, not before.
Your corpus, your flows and your cases in production. Sized by the assessment in the first step.
Only one piece is mandatory: model control. Without it there is nothing to govern. The rest is added when it is needed — or you bring it yourself, if you already run it.
Keys · Quotas · Expiry · Rate limits
The mandatory step in every call to a model: keys per team, a spending ceiling, and a record of who asked what.
Keys · Quotas · Expiry · Rate limits
The same control over keys, quotas and expiry that you hold over models, applied to your own APIs.
MCP · Registry · Versioning
One place to register, version and expose the tools your agents consume, instead of scattering them across projects.
Hybrid retrieval · Embeddings · Vectors
The tiered retrieval chain installed and verified, ready for you to load your documentation. Not embed-and-search: retrieval iterates before it answers.
LangGraph · LangChain
The engine your flows will run on: with state, retries and traces. The flows themselves are built afterwards, on top.
Traces · Cost · Failures
Knowing what was asked, what the model answered, what it cost and why it failed. Without this, any discussion about quality is an opinion.
Quality · Cost per case · Latency · Fallback
Which model serves each case and at what cost, measured on your data rather than public benchmarks. And which one takes over if the primary goes down.
Cloud posture · Attack paths · Exposure
Knowing which of everything you have deployed is actually reachable by an attacker, and how they would get there.
Spec-driven method · Agent and flow archetypes
Two things installed in your repositories: the method applications are built and maintained with, and the archetypes agents and flows are built from. Coaching is separate.
Two decisions — which cloud and which bays — and you have the whole scope in front of you: what has to be ready, and how each piece will be known to be done. Without leaving an email.
There is no platform of ours in the middle, no usage fee, and no operating contract this depends on to keep working. Everything we install stays as code in your repositories and as infrastructure in your cloud. If tomorrow you want to carry on alone, you carry on alone.
Every case is particular, and that shouldn't turn into a blank cheque. It is assessed with scope and timeframe fixed before anything starts.
You know you want to do something with AI but not whether it is feasible, what data it needs, or what it takes to get it into production.
Credited in full against the installation if you continue. With control and traces already in place, assessing a new case is a bounded exercise, not a project.
Tell us which team will use it and which cloud you are on. The first step comes out of that.
Talk to the team